|
Post by KittyLane on Mar 26, 2007 20:17:51 GMT -5
well not knowing the Ogham I myself cannot say for sure. I am only versed in the tarot. Also I can see aura's, but I prefer not to. I don't know anything about the Ogham either. Damn, I wish I could see aura's. That would be great. I did once when I was 15 but it never happened again. Maybe that was just like sleep deprivation or something at work. lol. Emphasis on the "or something" part. For me I can look a person for a length of time, concentrating I can see colors around the person. My reasoning for not wanting to is I really do not want to see people with negative ones. Makes me worry too much. You can work on seeing Aura's through meditation, a friend of mine helped me focus my, "skills", as they may be...LOL
|
|
|
Post by tahlia on Mar 27, 2007 12:58:58 GMT -5
I don't know anything about the Ogham either. Damn, I wish I could see aura's. That would be great. I did once when I was 15 but it never happened again. Maybe that was just like sleep deprivation or something at work. lol. Emphasis on the "or something" part. For me I can look a person for a length of time, concentrating I can see colors around the person. My reasoning for not wanting to is I really do not want to see people with negative ones. Makes me worry too much. You can work on seeing Aura's through meditation, a friend of mine helped me focus my, "skills", as they may be...LOL Is there any info here about that? I would definately be interested in reading more on the subject.
|
|
|
Post by tahlia on Mar 27, 2007 13:21:29 GMT -5
well not knowing the Ogham I myself cannot say for sure. I am only versed in the tarot. Also I can see aura's, but I prefer not to. Well I understand that Ogham use isn't something that is overly popular in the world of divination so I understand that people don't understand them, they're just the only thing I have to compare the Tarot to. So, I guess what I'm asking is, when you see a card in a reading and interpret it, do you do that in accordance to the basic meaning as it pertains to the question, or do you leave it open to some personal interpretation? Well for me the traditional meaning of the card is always in my head but sometimes that just obviously isn't right. It's always open to interpretation, intuition etc. The initial feeling I get from the card individually or from the spread as a whole is what I go with. Some times those feelings fit nicely with the traditional meanings and sometimes not. I never have a strictly "by the book" reading. I've never been one for doing anything by the book though. Basicly I let my intuition have free reign but kinda keep the traditional meanings as a building block or a starting point or reference point of sorts. Does that make sense? I think it's very much like a puzzle. The traditional "by the book" meanings are the outer edge of it. The other 900 pieces are the interpretation, the intuitive part. That's the real heart of the puzzle but you need that outer edge done first if you wanna have any hope of piecing together the meaningful part of it. I hope I didn't just confuse y'all more.
|
|
|
Post by KittyLane on Mar 27, 2007 14:25:26 GMT -5
For me I can look a person for a length of time, concentrating I can see colors around the person. My reasoning for not wanting to is I really do not want to see people with negative ones. Makes me worry too much. You can work on seeing Aura's through meditation, a friend of mine helped me focus my, "skills", as they may be...LOL Is there any info here about that? I would definately be interested in reading more on the subject. let me do a little digging within my studies, and get back with you ok?
|
|
|
Post by tahlia on Mar 27, 2007 14:29:45 GMT -5
Is there any info here about that? I would definately be interested in reading more on the subject. let me do a little digging within my studies, and get back with you ok? Sweet! I'm looking forward to hearing more on this.
|
|
|
Post by Senbecc on Mar 27, 2007 15:06:09 GMT -5
Well I understand that Ogham use isn't something that is overly popular in the world of divination so I understand that people don't understand them, they're just the only thing I have to compare the Tarot to. So, I guess what I'm asking is, when you see a card in a reading and interpret it, do you do that in accordance to the basic meaning as it pertains to the question, or do you leave it open to some personal interpretation? Well for me the traditional meaning of the card is always in my head but sometimes that just obviously isn't right. It's always open to interpretation, intuition etc. The initial feeling I get from the card individually or from the spread as a whole is what I go with. Some times those feelings fit nicely with the traditional meanings and sometimes not. I never have a strictly "by the book" reading. I've never been one for doing anything by the book though. Basicly I let my intuition have free reign but kinda keep the traditional meanings as a building block or a starting point or reference point of sorts. Does that make sense? I think it's very much like a puzzle. The traditional "by the book" meanings are the outer edge of it. The other 900 pieces are the interpretation, the intuitive part. That's the real heart of the puzzle but you need that outer edge done first if you wanna have any hope of piecing together the meaningful part of it. I hope I didn't just confuse y'all more. Nah, I'd say you explained it pretty good actually. I suppose any sort of divination would be something like putting a puzzle together. On Auras, a couple of weeks ago there was a holistic fair where I did a class on Celtic centers of the world/being and there was this guy who had a camera that took pictures of Auras...It was neat, and yes I have a picture of mine now too
|
|
|
Post by KittyLane on Mar 27, 2007 21:53:11 GMT -5
Well for me the traditional meaning of the card is always in my head but sometimes that just obviously isn't right. It's always open to interpretation, intuition etc. The initial feeling I get from the card individually or from the spread as a whole is what I go with. Some times those feelings fit nicely with the traditional meanings and sometimes not. I never have a strictly "by the book" reading. I've never been one for doing anything by the book though. Basicly I let my intuition have free reign but kinda keep the traditional meanings as a building block or a starting point or reference point of sorts. Does that make sense? I think it's very much like a puzzle. The traditional "by the book" meanings are the outer edge of it. The other 900 pieces are the interpretation, the intuitive part. That's the real heart of the puzzle but you need that outer edge done first if you wanna have any hope of piecing together the meaningful part of it. I hope I didn't just confuse y'all more. Nah, I'd say you explained it pretty good actually. I suppose any sort of divination would be something like putting a puzzle together. On Auras, a couple of weeks ago there was a holistic fair where I did a class on Celtic centers of the world/being and there was this guy who had a camera that took pictures of Auras...It was neat, and yes I have a picture of mine now too ummm share!
|
|
|
Post by tahlia on Mar 28, 2007 1:56:33 GMT -5
Well for me the traditional meaning of the card is always in my head but sometimes that just obviously isn't right. It's always open to interpretation, intuition etc. The initial feeling I get from the card individually or from the spread as a whole is what I go with. Some times those feelings fit nicely with the traditional meanings and sometimes not. I never have a strictly "by the book" reading. I've never been one for doing anything by the book though. Basicly I let my intuition have free reign but kinda keep the traditional meanings as a building block or a starting point or reference point of sorts. Does that make sense? I think it's very much like a puzzle. The traditional "by the book" meanings are the outer edge of it. The other 900 pieces are the interpretation, the intuitive part. That's the real heart of the puzzle but you need that outer edge done first if you wanna have any hope of piecing together the meaningful part of it. I hope I didn't just confuse y'all more. Nah, I'd say you explained it pretty good actually. I suppose any sort of divination would be something like putting a puzzle together. On Auras, a couple of weeks ago there was a holistic fair where I did a class on Celtic centers of the world/being and there was this guy who had a camera that took pictures of Auras...It was neat, and yes I have a picture of mine now too That sounds kinda cool. Wonder how that works? I'll have to go look it up. And yes, you should share that with the class!
|
|
|
Post by Senbecc on Mar 28, 2007 11:54:07 GMT -5
Nah, I'd say you explained it pretty good actually. I suppose any sort of divination would be something like putting a puzzle together. On Auras, a couple of weeks ago there was a holistic fair where I did a class on Celtic centers of the world/being and there was this guy who had a camera that took pictures of Auras...It was neat, and yes I have a picture of mine now too That sounds kinda cool. Wonder how that works? I'll have to go look it up. And yes, you should share that with the class! @ You-n-Kitty both...The picture? hahahahahahaha...No lol, I look like a freak in the picture it's self lol...But, from what he said there is allot of technical things that go into it, but you'd sit in this booth and he'd take the picture. Now while I don't know anything about it myself I did find some information on it. (And no, they're not the same guy or anything) amasci.com/freenrg/aura/aura.htmlwww.auraphoto.com/Aura/UserReports.htmlwww.amazon.com/Capturing-Aura-Integrating-Technology-Metaphysics/dp/1577330722(info is towards the middle) Everyone has conflicting ideas on whether these cameras are valid it seems...I was still a psycodellic picture tho
|
|
|
Post by tahlia on Mar 28, 2007 14:43:29 GMT -5
No lol, I look like a freak in the picture it's self I really doubt that. Still think you should share. Chicken. lol
|
|
|
Post by KittyLane on Mar 28, 2007 20:38:47 GMT -5
No lol, I look like a freak in the picture it's self I really doubt that. Still think you should share. Chicken. lol yes he is chicken! you should share with your community...
|
|
|
Post by Senbecc on Mar 29, 2007 22:46:22 GMT -5
I really doubt that. Still think you should share. Chicken. lol yes he is chicken! you should share with your community... I really doubt that. Still think you should share. Chicken. lol LoL, lol so wrong...I'm only cute on Tuesdays
|
|